> The trap you're seeing here is that iterating over an iterator always > consumes it, but mentally, you're expecting this to be iterating over > a new instance of the same sequence.
No, I just tried to apply what I read in the docs : 1. I have y = A(10) which is an instance of a class which does not define __contains__ but does define __iter__ 2. The value z = 0 is produced while iterating over y. 3. The sentence "x in y is true if some value z with x == z is produced while iterating over y" lead me to think that "0 in y" would be true. -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
