On 2015-08-23 16:20, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
On Sunday 23 Aug 2015 16:05 CEST, Johannes Bauer wrote:
On 22.08.2015 16:15, Christian Gollwitzer wrote:
Probably yes. You should take a look at the OP again and compare
the time stamps. It says that in between two consecutive calls of
the same program, the request was served once in a second, and once
with serious delays. Despite that the server is localhost. In
between both trials there are 20 seconds. I do not see, how git
bisect would help here.
I do completely understand that in two consecutive runs one time the
problem occurs and the other time it doesn't.
It's highly unlikely that such a bug would ever have passed the
bottle QA and if it did it would affect thousands of users (who
would report this issue, since it's very severe). It is much more
likely the bug is somewhere within the OP's program. By git bisect
he can find out where he introduced the bug.
You have to explain something to me: how can I introduce a bug without
changing anything? Maybe by having wrong thoughts?
Note that this says nothing about the location of the bug, in can
still be either in the OPs code or in the framework.
Yup. Note that he has now shifted from blaming bottle to blaming
Firefox. Same thing with that claim. If somehow website delivery was
delayed 6 seconds reproducibly, people would have noticed.
I never blamed bottle, I was asking if it could be a problem with
bottle.
The subject says otherwise. :-)
[snip]
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
