Ian Kelly wrote: > On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 1:12 AM, Frank Millman <fr...@chagford.com> wrote: >> That makes me wonder if, in my project, I can import all modules inside >> 'start.py', and then just use 'import package_name' inside each module? > > You can, but for readability and reuse I think it's better to be > explicit in each module and import the fully qualified module names > that are needed, rather than relying on some other module to import > them for you. > >> Another question - I thought that, because aa.py and bb.py are in >> different sub-directories, I would have to set them up as packages by >> adding '__init__.py' to each one, but it works fine without that. What am >> I missing? > > That surprises me also, but I suspect it's because they're > subdirectories of the current working directory rather than packages > found on the sys.path.
So even the experts cannot keep up with all those nifty new features: https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0420/ (Implicit Namespace Packages) I'm waiting to see the language collapse under all its nice and -- seen in isolation -- incredibly useful additions. C++ we're coming :( -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list