Oops, missing print:
On 10.09.2015 20:45, Sven R. Kunze wrote:
On 10.09.2015 20:34, Sven R. Kunze wrote:
You are right. I turned out to me harder that I first thought.
My initial guess was like: use AST. But now I see, it would be hard
to get the source code.
So, what actually could work, would be faking the interactive
interpreter wrapping it up and thus have control over the source code
typed in.
Ha, got it: sys.settrace
>>> def traceit(frame, event, arg):
... print(frame, event, arg)
... return traceit
>>> sys.settrace(traceit)
>>> a=1
(<frame object at 0x7ff9016785c0>, 'call', None)
(<frame object at 0x7ff9016785c0>, 'line', None)
(<frame object at 0x7ff9016785c0>, 'return', (u'a=1\n', 4))
(<frame object at 0x7ff90168a1f8>, 'call', None)
(<frame object at 0x7ff90168a1f8>, 'line', None)
(<frame object at 0x7ff90168a1f8>, 'return', None)
There you got the source. The use an AST to find out whether the line
fits your definition of 'interactive'.
That should only be necessary when the top frame is interactive.
Best,
Sven
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
