On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 11:44 AM, Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote: > On 2015-09-16, Steven D'Aprano <st...@pearwood.info> wrote: >> On Thu, 17 Sep 2015 03:27 am, Grant Edwards wrote: >> >>> On 2015-09-16, Sven R. Kunze <srku...@mail.de> wrote: >>>> On 16.09.2015 18:57, Random832 wrote: >>>>> I think that chaining should be limited to: >>>>> >>>>> A) all operators are "=" >>>>> B) all operators are "is" >> >> [...] >>> I'm not all that sure A and B should be allowed. >> >> You can take `x == y == z` off me when you pry it from my cold, dead hands. > > Well, that case hadn't been mentioned yet. But, I agree that should be > added as case E and be allowed.
It was mentioned as case A, albeit mistakenly using "=" (which isn't even a comparison operator) instead of "==". -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list