On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 1:49 AM, Cecil Westerhof <ce...@decebal.nl> wrote: > - I understood that with > for fuel in fuel_cursor: > a fetchall will be executed. > At the moment I do not see this as a problem, but if the table would > become very big it could. Would it be better to rewrite it with a > fetchone? > But that is then needed inside and before the loop. What would be a > little ugly.
It iterates over the query, but it doesn't fetchall() into a list. So it's as good as using fetchone(). ChrisA -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
