In a message of Wed, 21 Oct 2015 11:30:25 -0700, Peter Brittain writes:
>I have recently been working on a terminal/console animation package 
>(https://github.com/peterbrittain/asciimatics). Beyond the high-level 
>animation methods/objects it provides, it also needed to be cross-platform and 
>and simple to install with pip (including any dependencies).
>
>This cross-platform requirement meant I needed a curses equivalent for 
>Windows.  This appears to have been a regular issue over the years and I've 
>looked around at previous answers on the web and this newsgroup.  Now while 
>there's some pretty neat stuff out there, nothing actually gave me everything 
>I needed.
>
>1) colorama only gives you colours and cursor positioning, but no input, 
>resizing or screen-scraping options.
>
>2) blessings/blessed provide better (but incomplete) APIs than the curses 
>package, but no Windows support unless you use colorama (which is still 
>limited as above).
>
>3) console (from effbot.org) is a native installer and so fails the pip test.  
>It does however show direct use of the win32 API is a tenable approach.
>
>4) The other packages I found were either dead projects or relied on a native 
>installation of an open source implementation of curses - with no pip install 
>option available.
>
>I therefore started writing a consistent wrapper API (the Screen object) that 
>uses the curses package on Unix variants and pywin32 to access the Windows 
>console API.  
>
>Over the last few months I've rounded out the features and proved that 
>asciimatics works identically on Linux (various distros), OSX and Windows 
>7-10.   I know that there are still some rough edges due to the history of the 
>project and so I've been deprecating old APIs in preparation for creating a 
>completely clean API when I create the next major (v2.x) release.
>
>I suspect that it could be even better though, so am looking for feedback and 
>ideas from the community - both on the high-level animation features and the 
>low-level cross-platform terminal API.  
>
>Is there something you can see that could be usefully improved?  All feedback 
>welcome.
>-- 

Did you try https://pypi.python.org/pypi/UniCurses ?

Laura
-- 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Reply via email to