On Tue, 3 Nov 2015 03:23 pm, ru...@yahoo.com wrote: > Regular expressions should be learned by every programmer or by anyone > who wants to use computers as a tool. They are a fundamental part of > computer science and are used in all sorts of matching and searching > from compilers down to your work-a-day text editor.
You are absolutely right. If only regular expressions weren't such an overly-terse, cryptic mini-language, with all but no debugging capabilities, they would be great. If only there wasn't an extensive culture of regular expression abuse within programming communities, they would be fine. All technologies are open to abuse. But we don't say: Some people, when confronted with a problem, think "I know, I'll use arithmetic." Now they have two problems. because abuse of arithmetic is rare. It's hard to misuse it, and while arithmetic can be complicated, it's rare for programmers to abuse it. But the same cannot be said for regexes -- they are regularly misused, abused, and down-right hard to use right even when you have a good reason for using them: http://www.thedailywtf.com/articles/Irregular_Expression http://blog.codinghorror.com/regex-use-vs-regex-abuse/ http://psung.blogspot.com.au/2008/01/wonderful-abuse-of-regular-expressions.html If there is one person who has done more to create a regex culture, it is Larry Wall, inventor of Perl. Even Larry Wall says that regexes are overused and their syntax is harmful, and he has recreated them for Perl 6: http://www.perl.com/pub/2002/06/04/apo5.html Oh, and the icing on the cake, regexes can be a security vulnerability too: https://www.owasp.org/index.php/Regular_expression_Denial_of_Service_-_ReDoS -- Steven -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
