Benjamin Niemann wrote: > Christoph Zwerschke wrote: > > >>Benjamin Niemann wrote: >> >>>Some (many?) people don't like the unittest module, because it is not >>>very pythonic - nothing to wonder as it has its root in the Java world. >>>That's probably one of the reasons why there are other (more pythonic) >>>unittesting frameworks for Python out there. >> >>So I think it would have been better that "unittest" had been named >>"PUnit" to make clear that it is a JUnit port and to allow a more >>pythonic testing framework to be added to the Python's standard lib. > > > It was called PyUnit before it was integrated into the stdlib. Dunno why it > was renamed...
unittest describes exactly what it does. pyunit says that it is in Python (duh), and that it has something to do with units, which could be a whole number of things. I'm thankful that logging is called logging as well, rather than log4py. -- Michael Hoffman -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
