On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 4:30 AM, Peter Pearson <pkpearson@nowhere.invalid> wrote: > Agreed. It's annoying when an agency goes to the trouble of making > huge datasets available online, but fails to identify the format. > > But the 16-bits-per-pixel hypothesis is unlikely, given that each > byte tends to echo its predecessor: > > 0000130 ffff ffff ffff ffff ffff ffff ffff ffff > 0000140 ffff ffff ffff c0ff c1c0 c3c3 c3c3 c4c4 > 0000150 c4c4 c3c4 c3c3 c4c4 c3c3 c3c3 c3c3 c3c3 > 0000160 c4c4 c4c4 c5c4 c6c5 c7c7 c7c7 c5c5 c6c5
Hmm. With just a few exceptions. Maybe it's two channels or something - is that what you mean by "taken at different wavelengths"? Definitely it's begging for format identification from the source. ChrisA -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
