Steven D'Aprano <st...@pearwood.info>: > Oh, and talking about DVCS: > > https://bitquabit.com/post/unorthodocs-abandon-your-dvcs-and-retur > n-to-sanity/
It's interesting how different opinions people can have about version control. I also have mine. I have seen the paradise, which was Sun's Teamware. I haven't tried Bitkeeper, it's successor. Having struggled with Perforce, SVN and CVS, I was hopeful Mercurial would be everything Teamware was. Unfortunately, it wasn't. The big disappointment was the treatment of a repository as the atomic unit. Git's no better than Mercurial. Also, Git is conceptually cluttered. Well, Git and Mercurial are not all that bad as long as only a single person is working on the repository at any given time and you have a strictly linear version history. That would be advisable anyway as you should have a separate repository for each conceptual unit. Marko -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
