On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 2:56 AM, Chris Angelico <ros...@gmail.com> wrote: > > We would have to skip a few - 3.I and 3.O are too confusing, and 3.X > would wreak havoc with people's heads. But then, so would 3.A... > > Let's do this. Wreak the havoc. Unleash the folly. Dispel the sanity! >
There would also be 3.< 3.> 3.= Not to mention that if the number increased a lot, we would eventually hit "other numbers" and get 3.<circled one>, etc. -- Bernardo Sulzbach -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
