On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 2:44 AM, Random832 <random...@fastmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Feb 8, 2016, at 10:40, Ian Kelly wrote: >> Besides, you're forgetting that the whole point of having so many >> backwards incompatible changes in Python 3 in the first place was to >> get them out of the way and not have to do them further into the >> future. Python 4.0 has never been planned to be anything more than an >> incremental release like Python 2.0, and AIUI the only reason any of >> the core devs are even talking about Python 4 at this point in time is >> because Guido doesn't like "3.10" as a version number. > > I still think we should just retroactively declare 3.5 to be python 5, > and then keep going with python 6, 7, etc...
http://dirtsimple.org/2004/12/python-is-not-java.html ChrisA -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
