On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 12:00 PM, BartC <b...@freeuk.com> wrote: > Yes of course it does. As does 'being slow'. Take another microbenchmark: > > def whiletest(): > | i=0 > | while i<=100000000: > | | i+=1 > > whiletest() > > Python 2.7: 8.4 seconds > Python 3.1: 12.5 seconds > Python 3.4: 18.0 seconds > > Even if you don't care about speed, you must admit that there appears to be > something peculiar going on here: why would 3.4 take more than twice as long > as 2.7? What do they keep doing to 3.x to cripple it on each new version?
How do your benchmarks compare on this code: pass ChrisA -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
