On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 12:18 AM, Mark Lawrence <breamore...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > I have dealt with some complete dumbos in the years that I've been online, > but when it comes to thickos you're right up there with the RUE, and I can > assure you that this is meant to be an insult. > > To your way of thinking run time speed is the sole issue with programming, > and trivial details like accuracy are irrelevant. "Look, Python has taken a > whole minute to process this data, but BartC has done it in one nanosecond". > "Yes, but Python is 100% accurate, BartC is 100% inaccurate". "Who cares, > only speed counts".
Mark, you don't need to be this vitriolic. It's possible to disagree with Bart without being a complete <censored> yourself. Please, have a read of my previous post, and give yourself a moment to cool down. At no time has Bart ever said that accuracy is unimportant; at worst, he's sacrificing dynamism, maybe maintainability, but not accuracy. A little calmness, please. ChrisA -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list