Poul Riis <prii...@gmail.com> writes: > Is it possible to transfer results from sympy to 'normal' python.
Is Sympy not “normal Python”? What transfer are you intending? > In the case below I think my intention is clear enough but it does not > work as intended. How can it be done? First: no, your intention is not clear. Please write idiomatic Python: spaces around operators, names which describe the meaning. Follow the coding style guide PEP 8 <URL:https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0008/>. Second: no, the intent is obscured because you are using ‘from sympy import *’. This clobbers the global namespace, making it much more difficult to tell which names come from a different namespace. Instead, do ‘import sympy’ and qualify names ‘sympy.Symbol’, etc. Third: if the code “does not work as intended”, then the answer can be no better than “change it until it works as intended”. If you want more detail, please provide more detail on what it *is* doing, and what you think it *should* do instead. -- \ “I bet one legend that keeps recurring throughout history, in | `\ every culture, is the story of Popeye.” —Jack Handey | _o__) | Ben Finney -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list