On Monday, August 22, 2016 at 8:05:15 AM UTC-4, Marko Rauhamaa wrote: > rocky <ro...@gnu.org>: > > > A slightly different but related problem is noting the Python dialect > > at the package-level. > > I don't know what if anything is needed support this idea, but one > option would be to just use "import": > > import python3_5_17 > > That would require Python and modules to install such empty modules to > indicate that they support the given API. > > > Marko
Yes, that is the intent of File/module python30.py in the first post. The only difference is that because there is code too, when run, it can enforce the version declared. As mentioned originally, a problem with this is that you have a proliferation of names and files. Better, I htink would be a way to pass a parameter string. Perl's "use" mechanism happens to allow passing in such a parameter. In Python without syntactic sugar this would be a two-step process of first importing and then calling something with the version range. -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
