On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 4:40 PM, <mlzarathus...@gmail.com> wrote: > Precedence, d'oh! > > rs *= (n-(i-1))/i > is equivalent to: > rs = rs * ((n-(i-1))/i) > > not > rs = rs * (n-(i-1))/i > > which is the same as > rs = ( rs * (n-(i-1)) ) /i > > > Ken Iverson was right. Precedence is a bad idea.
No, precedence is not a bad idea. Making assumptions based on a lack of precedence, now, that's a bad idea. But the problem is the assumption :) ChrisA -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
