On 12/09/2016 21:31, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
Ben Finney wrote:
"Frank Millman" <fr...@chagford.com> writes:
Assume you have a tuple of tuples -
a = ((1, 2), (3, 4))
You want to add a new tuple to it, so that it becomes
As you acknowledge, the tuple ‘a’ can't become anything else. Instead,
you need to create a different value.
Wrong.
The obvious way does not work -
a += (5, 6)
((1, 2), (3, 4), 5, 6)
^^^^^^
Right, because a tuple is immutable.
How did you get that idea? It has been mutated in the very statement that
you are quoting,
By the same argument, then strings and ints are also mutable.
Here, the original tuple that a refers to has been /replaced/ by a new
one. The original is unchanged. (Unless, by some optimisation that
recognises that there are no other references to it, the original is
actually appended to. But in general, new objects are constructed when
implementing +=.)
--
Bartc
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
