Torsten Bronger wrote: > I've been having a closer look at wxPython which is not Pythonic at > all and bad documented. Probably I'll use it nevertheless.
Aye. Couldn't agree more. > PyGTK and PyQt may have their own advantages and disadvantages. I like PyGTK because the calls are C-based and not as confusing as C++-based ones. It looks pretty good too... just a bit slow, but that was about a year ago. Speed may have improved since. > However, in my opinion we don't need yet another binding so thin > that C or C++ is shining through, but a modern replacement for > Tkinter with its Pythonic way of thinking. You will want to take a look at Fredrik Lundh's Tkinter 3000 and Widget Construction Kit: http://www.effbot.org/downloads/ http://www.effbot.org/zone/wck.htm I believe it deserves to be much more well-known that it currently is. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
