"Loren Wilton" <myspama...@earthlink.net> writes: > I've read that Python supports 'threads', and I'd assumed (maybe > incorrectly) that these were somewhat separate environments that could > be operating concurrently (modulo the GC lock). I assume that data can > be shared between the threads,
Threads all run in the same address space. Data "can be" shared is an understatement--it IS shared, so threads can interfere with each other very easily. You have to be quite careful to prevent that, and thread programming has a reputation for being difficult for that reason. > Would using threads help me do what I want? I don't think Python threads are the answer. You want a separate interpreter per user, which is annoying to do with CPython. Do you have concrete performance expectations about the sharing of data between interpreter sessions? Those old mainframes were very slow compared to today's machines, even counting Python's interpretation overhead. -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
