Nathan Ernst wrote:
There is no reason you cannot introduce a static class with pure static members (i.e. the Math class in System). A static class effectively becomes another namespace in C++ parlance. I'll admit the syntax is a bit odd, and enforces you, at a minimum to use the outer name a as a qualifier,
That's the thing I find most frustrating about both C# and Java, the lack of anything like Python's "from ... import ...". You get a choice of either effectively doing "import *" on the contents of a whole class and polluting your namespace, or Fully.Qualifying. Every.Little.Thing. -- Greg -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
