On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 12:04 PM, Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohn...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Well, maybe. As is pointed out many, many times, 99% of >> Python code avoids the sorts of extreme dynamism that keeps >> things slow. Lots of people would be satisfied with a >> language *really close* to Python that was ten or twenty >> times faster, even if it meant that you couldn't write code >> like this: >> >> >> answer = input("What's your name?") >> exec("name = %r" % answer) >> print(name) > > Yeah, but then we'd be discriminating against Chris. Between > Python, Pike, Ook and MUDs, that pretty much defines the > extent of Chris' life.
Okay, I have a pretty thick skin, but this is getting a bit obnoxious. Can you PLEASE post something that isn't just insulting me? Thanks. ChrisA -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list