On Wed, 19 Apr 2017 08:34:03 +1000, Chris Angelico wrote: > On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 8:28 AM, Ben Finney <ben+pyt...@benfinney.id.au> > wrote: >> Chris Angelico <ros...@gmail.com> writes: >> >>> The charge has been examined and dropped. Steven did not violate the >>> CoC. Please stop talking as if he has. He *was accused of* violating >>> it, and then found innocent. >> >> Which post are you referring to (can you provide a URL)? I'd like to see >> who came to that conclusion, what their wording was, and what their >> authority was to do so. > > I was referring to your post, in which a fairly solid argument was > made for there being no guilt. Maybe you don't have any specific > authority, but until someone actually acts in a moderatorial role, > solid arguments are plenty authoritative enough for most of us. > Particularly for the newsgroup people, where there is no central > authority at all. > > ChrisA
I believe the lack of moderator action supports the conclusion that the CoC was not violated. -- <Wildman> GNU/Linux user #557453 The cow died so I don't need your bull! -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
