On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 4:53 AM, Stefan Ram <r...@zedat.fu-berlin.de> wrote:
> r...@zedat.fu-berlin.de (Stefan Ram) writes:
>>The "The Python Library Reference, Release 3.6.0" (LIB) says:
>>»it must support the sequence protocol (the
>>__getitem__() method with integer arguments
>>starting at 0).«.
>>But in the "The Python Language Reference, Release 3.6.0"
>>(LANG) this is called »old sequence iteration« or »old-style
>>iteration« with the (new) sequence protocol being augmented
>>by »__len__«.
>
> Can one say that the authoritative test for being »iterable«
> and being »a sequence« is testing whether the object is an
> instance of »collections.abc.Iterable« and
> »collections.abc.Sequence«, respectively?
>
> Some parts of the references explain that implementing the
> sequence protocol means to have a »__getitem__« method and
> possibly also a »__len__« method. But, by inheritance,
> »collections.abc.Sequence« seems to require /more/. I.e.,
>
>>>> import collections.abc
>
>>>> d = { 1: 2 }
>
>>>> d.__len__
> <method-wrapper '__len__' of dict object at 0x00000000023578B8>
>
>>>> d.__getitem__
> <built-in method __getitem__ of dict object at 0x00000000023578B8>
>
>>>> isinstance( d, collections.abc.Sequence )
> False
>
> And the reference does /not/ list dictionary under "Sequences".
A dictionary isn't a sequence. At very least, you have to be able to
start with d[0] and go up from there; and that is indeed a valid
*iterable* protocol:
>>> class Demo:
... def __getitem__(self, item):
... item = int(item)
... if 0 <= item < 10: return item * item
... raise IndexError
...
>>> list(Demo())
[0, 1, 4, 9, 16, 25, 36, 49, 64, 81]
But that isn't a sequence still. Be careful that you aren't looking at
*iterable* protocol instead.
ChrisA
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
