On 9/8/17 10:23 AM, Leam Hall wrote: > On 09/08/2017 09:57 AM, Ned Batchelder wrote: >> I've heard a lot of FUD about the Python 3 transition, but this one is >> new to me. What is it that CompSci folks want that developers don't >> want, that ruined Python 3? > > > It's not FUD if it's true. Calling it FUD without checking is, um, > FUD. The phrase was "many of the changes in Python 3 are theoretically > based, cleaning up of how Python does things to make them fit with > what Computer Science teaches."
I tried to check, but Google doesn't find me that quote, so I'm not sure if there was further elaboration. I still don't know which of the Python 3 changes were foisted on us by those bothersome theoretical Computer Science people. --Ned. -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list