Op 2017-09-10, Chris Angelico schreef <ros...@gmail.com>: > Want to make something iterable? Define __iter__. Want to make it > async-iterable (with "async for")? Define __aiter__. It's a bit clunky > if you want the same object to be iterable both ways, but I don't know > of any real-world situations where that's the case.
Would we not eventually want a file object to deliver its lines asynchronously (with non-blocking reads under the hood) if iterated over with "async for", while preserving the current blocking behavior in the "for" case? Stephan -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
