Mark Lawrence <breamore...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 09/02/18 11:23, John Ladasky wrote: > > > > I haven't visited GMane in a few years, but I found it difficult to > > navigate. > In particular, I found searching to be cumbersome. Weren't the archives > broken into 30-day blocks? > > > > I just tried GMane again two minutes ago. I can't confirm my recollections, > but right now what I'm seeing is worse. If you follow this link right now... > (http://gmane.org/find.php?list=comp.lang.python)... you get this: > > > > "Not all of Gmane is back yet - We're working hard to restore everything" > > > > And if you follow the link labeled "The latest news is at Gmane News" > at the bottom of that page, it takes you here... (http://home.gmane.org/)... > and the top blog post discussing site repairs is dated September 2016! > > > > > I'm not too excited about trying GMane again after seeing that. > > > > Please don't waste your time with the gmane website. Just point any > (semi-)decent mail client like Thunderbird at news.gmane.org and you've
Surely you mean NNTP/Usenet client. > access to hundreds of Python lists and thousands of other technical > lists. I find the search facilities perfectly adequate. > -- Chris Green ยท -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
