On Sun, May 27, 2018 at 10:36:30AM +1000, Ben Finney wrote: > Nick also explains that, because the name ‘_’ has too many conventional > meanings already, the name ‘__’ is better for “don't need this value but > I am required to specify a name”.
_() is often bound to gettext.gettext() in the global
namespace, so we'd better avoid that or else ...
[ _(_) for _ in '123' ]
... will fail :-)
Karsten
--
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
