On 2018-03-21 09:27:37 -0400, Larry Martell wrote: > Yeah, I saw that and I wasn't trying to reinvent the wheel. On this > page https://docs.python.org/2/library/multiprocessing.html it says > this: > > The multiprocessing package offers both local and remote concurrency, > effectively side-stepping the Global Interpreter Lock by using > subprocesses instead of threads. Due to this, the multiprocessing > module allows the programmer to fully leverage multiple processors on > a given machine. > > I took 'remote concurrency' to mean I could use it run a process on > another host.
Yes. > But I don't see how to do that, and I was asking if it was possible or > am I misinterpreting the docs. It is described on the same page, a little bit farther down: https://docs.python.org/2/library/multiprocessing.html#using-a-remote-manager hp -- _ | Peter J. Holzer | we build much bigger, better disasters now |_|_) | | because we have much more sophisticated | | | h...@hjp.at | management tools. __/ | http://www.hjp.at/ | -- Ross Anderson <https://www.edge.org/>
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
