Sharan Basappa <[email protected]> writes:
> For example, Python lists are mutable.
Yes, that's correct.
> BTW, is the below explanation correct (it is taken from a book I am
> reading)
>
> Python lists are mutable sequences. They are very similar to tuples,
> but they don't have the restrictions due to immutability.
>
> It says lists are mutable and then says they are immutable???
The passage is correct, but is ambiguously phrased.
You appear to be parsing it as:
Python lists are mutable sequences. They are very similar to tuples,
but {{they don't have the restrictions} due to immutability}.
which would imply that Python lists are both mutable and are immutable.
Instead, I think the intended parsing is:
Python lists are mutable sequences. They are very similar to tuples,
but {they don't have {the restrictions due to immutability}}.
implying that Python lists are mutable; and then contrasting lists
against Python tuples which have “the restrictions due to immutability”.
Does that help?
You might send the publisher a request to clarify the text in a future
edition.
--
\ “To have the choice between proprietary software packages, is |
`\ being able to choose your master. Freedom means not having a |
_o__) master.” —Richard M. Stallman, 2007-05-16 |
Ben Finney
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
