On 07/03/18 06:32, Dennis Lee Bieber wrote:
On Mon, 2 Jul 2018 19:51:29 -0500, Tim Daneliuk <i...@tundraware.com>
declaimed the following:

Except that the current attempt is to use techniques like agile,
scrum, pair programming, and so forth to turn programming into
a factory activity.  High degrees of specialization are segmented
by architectural role (front end, back end, infrastructure,
DevOps ...), language, and even business unit.  In my view,
systems architecture, software design, and non functional
capabilities suffer thereby, but I am old and crabby :)

        Where do I join the "old and crabby" club?

        After 30 years with a DOD contractor where things went through PDR, CDR
(and often separate sets for requirements, followed by design, followed by
implementation), my last four years were in an environment as you describe
above -- where the requirements seemed to be written based upon what the
implementation of the week performed...


Welcome to the club, Dennis!  My last four years were also as Tim described, and that's what made me decide to retire early.

Another trend is that, with the high degree of compartmentalization, many of the programming jobs are now being farmed out overseas as black box bids.  After I retired, my team was sent to China to "train" a new group (read brain dump), and was then summarily disbanded.

-Jim


--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Reply via email to