On 18-07-18 10:07, Marko Rauhamaa wrote: >> Sure there were some surprises or gotcha's, but the result was still >> better than doing it in python2 and they were easier to deal with than >> in python2. > BTW, in those needs, even Python2 has Unicode strings and unicodedata at > your disposal.
Sure, just as there are byte strings at your disposal in python3. I also don't think using u'...' in python2 is less ugly than using b'...' in python3. -- Antoon. -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
