What if ply != com in the first (0th) iteration?
It's better to have an 'else:'-statement in your case, I suppose. -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
- For next loops no
- Re: For next loops no
- Re: For next loops Ben Finney
- Re: For next loops Brian Oney via Python-list
- Re: For next loops Neil Cerutti
