I’m using asyncio and I’d like to add an item to an object that others can wait on immediately and which eventually I will want to use to track a coroutine. In other words I want something like:
class Info: def __init__(self): self.done_task = asyncio.Future() info = Info() # do other stuff, but eventually coro = ... asyncio.connect_future(coro, info.done_task) I can certainly live without this, it simply requires adding an additional task made with asyncio.ensure_future and using that to set the result of done_task. But it would be a lot more elegant to just have the one future (especially if I have to cancel the wait, as I have to keep the extra task around so I can cancel it). So...just wondering if I missed something. Regards, Russell -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
