On 2018-11-22 09:58, Chris Angelico wrote: > On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 7:51 PM Thomas Jollans <t...@tjol.eu> wrote: >> >> On 21/11/2018 20:18, Python wrote: >>> $ python3 >>> Python 3.5.2 (default, Nov 23 2017, 16:37:01) >>> [GCC 5.4.0 20160609] on linux >>> Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information. >>>>>> 1 in [1,2,3] == True >>> False >>>>>> 1 in ([1,2,3] == True) >>> Traceback (most recent call last): >>> File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module> >>> TypeError: argument of type 'bool' is not iterable >>>>>> (1 in [1,2,3]) == True >>> True >>> >> >> See: https://github.com/cosmologicon/pywat ;-) >> > > I find it fascinating that quite a few of the Wats given on the > landing page are specifically poking fun at IEEE floating point > (completely documented and intended behaviour that exists across many > languages), yet the "Wat Quiz", also in that repository, specifically > excludes floats. TRWTF is inconsistently poking fun at a language's > consistencies.
Clearly the author was struggling to find "wat"s of the sort you get in Ruby or JavaScript. -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list