On 24/05/2019 21:23, Terry Reedy wrote:
I am responding to Paul indirectly because his post did not show up on the gmane mirror.

Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid>:

It also makes me ask why the Python team keeps
adding new stuff if it can't even keep the old stuff running.

Because the new stuff is expected to be more useful to more people than some of the old modules.  The module proposed for deletion are all or most all more than 20 years old, before there was a PyPI.  Some, like cgi and cgitb were legitimately put in the stdlib.  Others were specialist modules that today would not go in the stdlib.

Does anyone really think that gopherlib should still be in the stdlib, and that core developers should have to update its docs to explain it to newbies today?

I would want a better reason than "I don't wanna" to remove something from stdlib, much as I would want a better reason than "I want it" to add something. I agree that case is pretty much self-evident with gopherlib, which honestly would had trouble convincing me it should be included in the first place. I don't think it is at all self-evident for cgi and cgitb, even if I wouldn't have written them like that myself ;-)

My question is why people who value and understand old modules don't volunteer more to help keep them up to date.

As I said (and was apparently misinterpreted), I am considering it.

--
Rhodri James *-* Kynesim Ltd
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Reply via email to