R.Wieser schreef op 10/12/2019 om 13:44:
Also, when you scorn something without knowing your facts,
you tend to make yourself look like a fool :)
I tend to go with logic. No logic => it most likely doesn't work that way.
Choosing to go with a delayed action like you say will, as I already
explained, create problems later on (race conditions everywhere). And as I
do not think the designers of the language where that stupid I must
therefore reject your claim to what you think happens.
Chris: long-time contributor to this mailing list, lots of Python
experience, knows his stuff.
Rudy: new to Python, still learning the basics.
Chris: explains how things work, states the facts correctly.
Rudy: disregards all that and thinks he knows better.
Me: does not compute
But, as you mentioned, I do not know (all) the facts. Please do present
them. Maybe there is a logic in there I do not yet see.
Check out the 'with' statement.
I'm sorry, but nope.
That's a very foolish rejection.
Rudy, unless/until you know the language inside out, you'd better listen
to Chris and other people here who spend a lot of time and effort in
helping people like you. Don't correct them on things like this unless
you can cite chapter and verse.
You're doing yourselves a massive disservice by acting this way.
Best regards,
Roel
--
"Honest criticism is hard to take, particularly from a relative, a
friend, an acquaintance, or a stranger."
-- Franklin P. Jones
Roel Schroeven
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
