On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 8:20 AM Peter Otten <__pete...@web.de> wrote: > > Chris Angelico wrote: > > but an awkward way to spell it. If you mean to call the original wrap > > method, it would normally be spelled super().wrap(para) instead. > > Probably a workaround because super() cannot do its magic in the list > comprehensions namespace. Another workaround is to define > > wrap = super().wrap > > and then use just wrap() in the listcomp. >
Ah ha, I didn't think of that. And yes, I would agree, that's probably the cleanest way. Alternatively, the longhand super(__class__, self) should work too, as I believe __class__ isn't redefined by the implicit closure. ChrisA -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
