On 2020-04-28 17:52:58 +0200, Łukasz Langa wrote:
> Many new features for Python 3.9 are still being planned and written. Among 
> the new major new features and changes so far:
[...]
> PEP 617 <https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0617/>, New PEG parser for 
> CPython
[...]

On 2020-04-29 15:51:37 +0100, Robin Becker wrote:
> so presumably there has been some parser / language change which renders
> and'\n' illegal. Is this a real syntax error or an alpha issue? It looks
> like the tokenization has changed.

I'm not surprised that an entirely new parser behaves a bit differently in
edge cases.

The question is whether and'\n' is supposed to be legal.

        hp

-- 
   _  | Peter J. Holzer    | Story must make more sense than reality.
|_|_) |                    |
| |   | h...@hjp.at         |    -- Charles Stross, "Creative writing
__/   | http://www.hjp.at/ |       challenge!"

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

-- 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Reply via email to