On Mon, 5 Sep 2005 22:48:19 +0200, billiejoex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> there are "noob" questions and there are uneducated questions, yours >> are of the latter ( actually yours are STATEMENTS not questions ), and >> just trolling for what it is worth, if you would take the time to read >> what Python is and why it is you would not be asking these "questions". > > I'm really sorry man. I didn't wanted to be uneducated, believe me. > I wrote fastly, I'm new in Python and probably for my language problems I > didn't expressed concepts properly.
I didn't think they were uneducated, they were good questions. At least if one understands that the problem is that the /end user/ percieves a problem. I hope people are less hesitant to install "interpreted" applications today than they were ten years ago. I also believe it's better to convince the end user to install Python before installing the application[1], rather than to try to sneak in an interpreter with py2exe or something -- an interpreter which the end user cannot update, manage or use for other things. /Jorgen [1] Might be hard to convince people who have ever installed a Java interpreter -- when I do that on Windows, I usually break at least one existing Java application, and I usually get a whole lot of useless desktop icons, a funny thing in the system tray, etc. -- // Jorgen Grahn <jgrahn@ Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu \X/ algonet.se> R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn! -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list