On Mon, 17 Oct 2022 at 16:36, Antoon Pardon <antoon.par...@vub.be> wrote: > > > > Op 17/10/2022 om 04:01 schreef Chris Angelico: > > On Mon, 17 Oct 2022 at 10:46,<avi.e.gr...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> My point Chris was that you can have a conversation where you are exploring > >> and not proposing. Brainstorming, perhaps. > > And my point is that either a proposal is a serious one that can > > expect serious discussion, or it isn't. Yes, I'm aware that it wasn't > > you who backpedalled as soon as any criticism was posted, but your > > caveat comes to the same thing - if you're trying to avoid serious > > criticism, you have to not post an idea. > > Your reaction was not serious criticisme but a belligerent reaction. > You made it clear you wanted a fight. I choose not to enter that > fight. >
Well, if reacting strongly to a proposal to break LITERALLY EVERY PYTHON PROGRAM EVER counts as not a serious criticism but a belligerent reaction, then there's not really a lot of point discussing further. Bye. ChrisA -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list