On 20Nov2022 12:36, Chris Angelico <ros...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sun, 20 Nov 2022 at 12:27, Cameron Simpson <c...@cskk.id.au> wrote:
But really, is there any problem which cannot be solved with a
decorator? I've even got a @decorator decorator for my decorators.

Do you have a @toomanydecorators decorator to reduce the number of
decorators you need to decorate your decorators?

Apparently not :-)

    @classmethod
    @pfx_method
    @promote
    @typechecked
    def promote(cls, policy, epoch: Optional[Epoch] = None, **policy_kw):

and there aren't even any @require decorators on that one (from the excellent icontract package).

Cheers,
Cameron Simpson <c...@cskk.id.au>
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Reply via email to