On 2022-12-19 15:14:14 +0000, MRAB wrote: > On 2022-12-19 14:10, Peter J. Holzer wrote: > > He also interpreted the notation "6.67430(15)E-11" wrong. The > > digits in parentheses represent the uncertainty in the same number of > > last digits. So "6.67430(15)E-11" means "something between 6.67430E-11 - > > 0.00015E-11 and 6.67430E-11 + 0.00015E-11". [...] > To be fair, I don't think I've never seen that notation either!
I've probably seen it first on Wikipedia, quite a few years ago. Since
then I've also encountered in in physical and astronomical papers (I'm
neither a physicist nor an astronomomer but I occasionally read the
original papers if what I read in the "mainstream media"[1] or hear on
youtube seems suspect).
> I've only ever seen the form 6.67430E-11 ± 0.00015E-11, which is much
> clearer.
Yeah, it's definitely not the pinnacle of inuitiveness. I freely admit
that I looked it up before posting just to make sure that I wasn't
confused about its meaning.
Another problem (but it shares that with the ± notation) is that it's
not clear what that number actually represents. Is it one sigma or two?
Or something else? Is the distribution even symmetric?
hp
[1] I'm not quite happy with that term.
--
_ | Peter J. Holzer | Story must make more sense than reality.
|_|_) | |
| | | [email protected] | -- Charles Stross, "Creative writing
__/ | http://www.hjp.at/ | challenge!"
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
