On Sat, 7 Jan 2023 at 04:54, jacob kruger <jacob.kruger.w...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I am just trying to make up my mind with regards to what I should look
> into working with/making use of in terms of what have put in subject line?
>
>
> As in, if want to be able to trigger multiple/various threads/processes
> to run in the background, possibly monitoring their states, either via
> interface, or via global variables, but, possibly while processing other
> forms of user interaction via the normal/main process, what would be
> recommended?
>

Any. All. Whatever suits your purpose.

They all have different goals, different tradeoffs. Threads are great
for I/O bound operations; they're easy to work with (especially in
Python), behave pretty much like just having multiple things running
concurrently, and generally are the easiest to use. But you'll run
into limits as your thread count climbs (with a simple test, I started
seeing delays at about 10,000 threads, with more serious problems at
100,000), so it's not well-suited for huge scaling. Also, only one
thread at a time can run Python code, which limits them to I/O-bound
tasks like networking.

Multiple processes take a lot more management. You have to carefully
define your communication channels (for instance, a
multiprocessing.Queue() to collect results), but they can do CPU-bound
tasks in parallel. So multiprocessing is a good way to saturate all of
your CPU cores. Big downsides include it being much harder to share
information between the processes, and much MUCH higher resource usage
than threads (with the same test as the above, I ran into limitations
at just over 500 processes - way fewer than the 10,000 threads!).

Asynchronous I/O runs a single thread in a single process. So like
multithreading, it's only good for I/O bound tasks like networking.
It's harder to work with, though, since you have to be very careful to
include proper await points, and you can stall out the entire event
loop with one mistake (common culprits being synchronous disk I/O, and
gethostbyname). But the upside is that you get near-infinite tasks,
basically just limited by available memory (or other resources).

Use whichever one is right for your needs.

ChrisA
-- 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Reply via email to