On 5/14/23 13:00, Grizzy Adams via Python-list wrote:
Sunday, May 14, 2023 at 11:11, Mats Wichmann wrote:
Re: PythonPath / sys.path (at least in part)
On 5/14/23 10:43, Barry wrote:
I take it you have business reasons to use an obsolete version python.
Where did you get your version of python from?
In fact, a *nine* year old version of Python that reached end-of-life
four years ago.
Just sayin'
Python version shouldn't have anything to do with the sys.path, though.
I must have slept a while
Python 3.4.10 (default, Jul 14 2019, 14:41:03) [MSC v.1600 32 bit (Intel)] on
win32
Actually I did have 3..4.3 when I asked the question (first time) because I
could only find 3.4.10 as src and did not feel I was able to compile it with
any certainty ;->)
I have since moved up (a little) so only ~4 years old, I then updated pip from
9.x to 19.1
reason its an old version is it's an old PC (XpPro), if I start to get passable
yes, it's true that 3.4 was the last release supported on XP, so that's
a pretty good reason (of course we can ask why still running XP, but I
do understand old machines...)
at this I will try it on my Ubuntu box which is running 22.04 (latest LTS) and
23.04, (23.10 daily builds soon) I took a look and it seems I "may" have to
play a little to get IDLE on (if it's not in the normal repo's)
IDLE is still supported, you shouldn't have any trouble getting it.
https://packages.ubuntu.com/lunar/idle
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
