Tobiah <t...@tobiah.org> writes: > I should mention that I wanted to answer your question, > but I wouldn't actually do this. I'd rather opt for > your self.config = config solution. The config options > should have their own namespace. > > I don't mind at all referencing foo.config['option'], > or you could make foo.config an object by itself so > you can do foo.config.option. You'd fill it's attributes > in the same way I suggested for your main object.
Thanks for the thoughts. I'll go for self.config = config after all, since, as you say, the clutter caused by the referencing is not that significant. Cheers, Loris -- This signature is currently under constuction. -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
