Terry Reedy wrote: > You cannot tell whether a function object will act > recursive or not just by looking at its code body. Trivial examples:
I was thinking last night that maybe it would be useful to be able to define a function explicitly as a recursive object where it's frame is reused on successive calls, but then I realized that it's nearly identical to a loop in that context, so why not just write it as a loop to start with. Cheers, Ron -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
