Wolfgang Langner a écrit : > Hello, > >> "Is anyone truly attached to nested tuple function parameters; 'def >> fxn((a,b)): print a,b'? /.../ >> >> Would anyone really throw a huge fit if they went away? I am willing >> to write a PEP for their removal in 2.6 with a deprecation in 2.5 if >> people are up for it." > > > First I missed the def and thought "Oh no don't remove it > sometimes I pass a tuple to my functions". > But the I saw the "def" keyword and realized I never > used such a function syntax. > > So, in one line (my mailer truncated it): > > def fxn((a,b)): print a,b' > > for removal, not: > > 'fxn((a,b)' function calls > > > I'm ok with removal. > > > bye by Wolfgang
I use them a lot myself and I wouldn't want to see them removed. It is just so convenient to have 2D coordinates be simple tuples and have functions which alternatively take pos or (x,y) as a parameter. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
