> that Boo isn't enough like Python to > be a kind of Python - not necessarily a criticism, though, but an > observation.
This is correct. I completely agree with you and I'm not saying that boo is python. Again, I just said that it could be considered "almost" a static python implementation for .NET. It has many similarities, but also some fundamental differences, therefore, it is a different language. However, I think its similarities make it "pythonic" enough (or closely related to python) to be considered, commented and appreciated by the people in this mailing list. Unfortunately, others disagree with this idea, and insist (over and over again) that Boo is not python or that it has nothing to do with it. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
